<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>MeirLehman on RenatoTeixeira.com</title><link>https://www.renatoteixeira.com/tags/meirlehman/</link><description>Recent content in MeirLehman on RenatoTeixeira.com</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.renatoteixeira.com/tags/meirlehman/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Legacy Does Not Happen by Accident: What Lehman Still Teaches Us About Software Evolution</title><link>https://www.renatoteixeira.com/posts/legacy-does-no-happen-by-accident/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.renatoteixeira.com/posts/legacy-does-no-happen-by-accident/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Legacy does not emerge as an isolated failure, nor as a simple consequence of age. In most important systems, it is the result of continuous adaptation under real pressures: new requirements, operational constraints, accumulated decisions, and the constant need to remain useful in a changing environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is why &lt;strong&gt;Meir Lehman’s (1980)&lt;/strong&gt; article remains so valuable to me. It does not treat software as a static artifact, but as something shaped by ongoing evolution. And for that reason, I believe it deserves to be much better known by those who work in the day-to-day practice of IT.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>